Friday, February 04, 2011

World Congress of Faiths Interfaith Harmony Breakfast







Twelve people gathered to share breakfast with friends of faith between 8am and 10am on Thursday 3rd February in London SW2
Participants included Christian (Anglican, Quaker and Roman Catholic), Hindu, Jewish, Muslim (Shi’a and Sunni) and Sikh persons.

Conversation ranged over forthcoming journeys and inter faith events, support for projects in India and criticism of BBC Newsnight’s inadequate interview with the leader of the English Defence League.

Breakfast of juice, fruit, cereal, toast and croissant was rounded off by Rizwan’s magnificent inter faith harmony omelette. An enjoyable event is likely to be repeated.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

World Interfaith Harmony Week

Some of you may know that the UN has declared their support for a World Interfaith Harmony Week the first week of February.

We know that many of our members always contribute massively to the UK Interfaith week in the autumn, but this is such a good idea shared by many different nations, your executive feel it would be a real shame to let it pass us by.

So, can you see if you could invite a friend or two of a different faith tradition than your own to either breakfast, lunch or dinner during that first week of February and perhaps share something from your different faiths over the meal…and maybe even tell them something of the work we in the World Congress do and persuade them to join us!

Please do write and tell us about the meal, and perhaps send us a photo for our web-page.

I have registered out interest and support for this week with the World Interfaith Harmony organisation and I look forward to hearing about your shared meals/


Jackie Tabick

Chair



World Interfaith Harmony
Breakfasts/lunch or dinner

Sharing a meal and a prayer, meditation,
chant or intention with those of other faiths
.



Saturday, May 29, 2010

Inter Faith Network Meeting 26 May 2010

Report from Richard Boeke on:
Inter Faith Network's Faith Communities Forum Meeting 10.30am until 1pm.
Wednesday 26 May, chaired by IFN's Co-Chairs, Dr Girdari Bhan and
Bishop Alastair Redfern.

At the National Council for Voluntary Organisations, Regent's Wharf, 8 All Saints Street, London N1.

At a table with two-dozen representatives of Faith Communities, I took my seat between Dr. Anne Richards and Canon Michael Ipgrave, both Anglicans. Dr. Harriet Crabtree, Brian Pearce and two other staff of the IFN were there.

To two Hindus, I expressed sympathy on the death of Om Parkash Sharma. One was Mr. Ramesh Pattni from the Hindu Temple in Croyden.

The opening discussion concerned the new government, and the expectation of a cut in government funding for InterFaith programmes.
While this year’s funding is in place, much less is expected in 2011.
Eric Pickles is new Secretary of State for local governments. Other Government Leaders involved with Interfaith include Gregg Clark, Andrew Stunell, and Nick Hurd.

National Interfaith Week will go ahead for 21-27 November. Harriet Crabtree asked for ideas for the observances during Interfaith week.
The focus was on having a major event in London, as well as events throughout the United Kingdom. (For Horsham Interfaith, Catholic Bishop Kieran Conry has accepted our invitation to be our featured speaker, 1 PM, Saturday, 27 November)

Soundings: The last annual meeting of IFN called for some action on relating to traditions other than the “big nine” currently included in the IFN. Shall we accept Pagans? If so, “which of over a dozen pagan groups?” Philip Rosenberg from the Board of Deputies of British Jews made several comments. There was also discussion of groups like Christian Science, and Mormons, who are not accepted as part of the main stream of the Christian, Sikh, or Muslim tradition.

While there was general agreement to take some action, there was concern that any meeting called not be presented as a step toward these groups becoming members of IFN.

Dialogue? Brian Pearce suggested focus on the idea of SOUNDINGS, a day of listening. Pagans already attend IFN as representatives of local interfaith groups. Harriet Crabtree presented 2 DRAFTS of a possible one-day programme. As I understand the outcome,it was agreed that she would develop three-step process based roughly on DRAFT B:
1)As Director of the Interfaith Network, Harriet would present an overview of the past 20 years Inter-religious engagement in the UK.
2)Speakers from major faith communities would give their reflections.
3)Pagans and “Alternative Spiritualities” etc, would be heard (not argued with).

Equality Act: Brian Pearce reported on the Equality Act and the recent court case involving a registrar who would not conduct a same-sex civil union. The court did not rule on the religious element. Rather the ruling in essence said to the registrar: “there is a contact of employment. You have breached the contract of employment.
Thus, grounds for dismissal.”

Other Business: In Dubai, I. Singh reported 17 Indians sentenced to death for the killing of one Pakistani. Imam Sajid reported Facebook banned in two Muslim countries due to cartoon contest for images of Mohammed (forbidden by Quran) ADJORN.

Tuesday, May 04, 2010

European Council of Religious Leaders

The European Council of Religious Leaders met in Istanbul for the 7th Annual Meeting last month.
Two important documents were reviewed:
- A Declaration on Torelance : Our Commitment to Justice, Equality and Sharing, and
- a consultation document on Code on Holy sites

The first of these was approved - the second is now available for all to review and comment.

These documents are available at

http://www.worldfaiths.org/ECRL_Istanbul_declaration_on_Tolerance.pdf
and
http://www.worldfaiths.org/ECRL_Consultation_A_Code_on_Holy_Sites.pdf

Please feel free to copy these documents, review them within your own organisation and feed comments back to ECRL through me at imamsajid@worldfaiths.org

Imam Abduljalil Sajid
International Secretary
World Congress of Faiths
http://www.worldfaiths.org

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Need or Greed: What have we learned from the financial meltdown?

The WCF Moral Maze discussion in November 2009 in Southwark Cathedral was based on the recent financial crisis.

The following were the trigger points for the current financial meltdown.

Stage 1: Giving ordinary banks the right to create money and charge interest for its lending. Bearings and Leman Brothers that became bankrupt lent out 30 or more times money than the amounts that their depositors had given them. This is termed fractional reserve.
Stage 2: Placing a deposit on housing projects in US with the view of selling them at completion. If the housing prices and demand is high large profits are made, and conversely large losses are incurred when demand fails. This is termed leverage.
Stage 3: Deregulation in US mortgage based derivative (i.e. Mortgage backed securities) leading to a range of new financial instruments..
As the US house prices consistently rose, organisations and individual investors considered these new financial instruments to provide good comparable rate of financial return than shares or deposits in the bank, and there was insurance to provide cover in case of default of underlying mortgages.
This created great demand which led to large number of mortgages at very high percentage levels, being approved without completing due diligence prticularly to individuals considered as high risk (e.g. poor credit history, no assets, no job).
Companies like Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have existed for decades prior to deregulation
Stage 4: The US housing bubble burst. The housing prices fell, and as interest on mortgages rose there was a lot of default by high risk individuals. Organisations that had used leverage in the housing sector lost money, those who had invested in new financial instruments attempted to claim insurance, however insurance companies such as AIG were so inundated with claims and could not pay out, and that resulted in huge losses.
Stage 5: Due to losses, people were concerned about their money in the bank and more people than usual started to take their money out of banks, and banks eventually stopped lending to each other in the short term as they were concerned about their own position and the stability of the other bank. As global banking is based on fractional reserve, and it common to lend 10 times more money than the amount of deposit, this led to financial meltdown through lack of confidence in banking system, that had to be averted.

The reason for the financial meltdown: investors were consistently making so much money in the short term that they lost sight of the inherent risk in their decisions. Can this be termed greed?

Expert witness views ranged from associating developing countries’ debt to developed countries as the negative aspect of capitalism, to comparing capitalism to freedom of expression that has an innate positive effect which can be misused.

Overall the panel emphasised associating greater importance to non-materialism than materialism. Two members condemned usury on religious principles.


Tuesday, November 03, 2009

My Interfaith week diary

Nov 5th Moral Maze at Southwark Cathedral http://www.worldfaiths.org/events.php#southwark2
Nov 8th Youth interfaith event at Southwark plus participation in the Interfaith Service for peace
Nov 12th Lecture for Islington Interfaith Group, 'Why Bother with Interfaith?'
Nov 14th welcome group to synagogue service from Kingston Mosque.
Nov 15th Participate in Muslim/Jewish learning session at Regent's Park Mosque.
Nov 16th Lunch for local clergy at our synagogue
Nov 17th Talk on the care of Jewish patients at local hospital trust
Nov 18th Attend function at City Hall
Nov 19th Participate in panel at the Muhammadi Centre Willesden Green

Crazy, or what?


Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Preparing for the Parliament of World Religions


Swamis, imams, rabbis, priests and gurus and their followers across the world are preparing for a pilgrimage to Australia for the fifth Parliament of World Religions, meeting in Melbourne from December 3-9.

The first Parliament, often seen as the birth of the Interfaith movement, met in Chicago in 1893. It was hundred years later before the next Parliament, also in Chicago. Much of the twentieth century was shaped by Secularism, Communism and Fascism – all hostile to religions, which themselves were still competitive rather than co-operative. Even so, the importance of understanding between members of the world religions was slowly being recognised, thanks to the International Association of Religious Freedom and the World Congress of Faiths, founded in 1936 by the explorer and mystic Francis Younghusband, and the growing academic study of world religions.

The 1966 Second Vatican Council decree Nostra Aetate encouraged Christians to appreciate and dialogue with adherents of other religions. Some Christians and Buddhists worked together for peace in Vietnam and a wider interfaith coalition – now known as Religions for Peace – was created to oppose nuclear weapons.

By 1993, when the centenary of the first Parliament of Religions was celebrated at events in UK, India, Japan, as well as Chicago, Communism had collapsed. The 1993 Parliament emphasised the moral values which religions share. Toward a Global Ethic called on believers to commit to non-violence, a just economic order, tolerance and truthfulness and gender equality.

At the next Parliament in 1999, members of ‘The Guiding Institutions’ of civil society were, with limited success, encouraged to join the dialogue. More important, meeting in the new multi-racial and multi-religious South Africa, the Parliament showed religions’ usefulness in strengthening social cohesion.

Following the 9/11 attack, the emphasis of the 2004 Parliament was on showing that in no religion’s authentic teaching, is there justification for killing innocent people. Meeting in Barcelona, where from Europe one can see the coast of Africa, the need for a dialogue of civilizations was obvious. Four key issues were highlighted – access to clean water, the plight of refugees, cancellation of poor nation’s debt and reducing religiously motivated violence.

Meeting at the same time as the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference and with the active participation of many Aboriginals, the danger to the environment will be high on the agenda of this year’s Parliament. The overall theme is ‘Make a World of Difference: Hearing each other, healing the earth.’ The focus will be on the environment, peace, overcoming poverty, and strengthening global interconnectedness. Some may ask whether travelling from Europe to Australia is good for the climate, but the distance for Australians to Copenhagen is the same and participants are encouraged to offset their carbon footprint.

The Parliament is not a legislative body that passes resolutions – but a Parliament, in the original sense, of an occasion where people talk to each other. It is not primarily a meeting of ‘religious leaders.’ Each participant has to decide how he or she will make a ‘world of difference,’ rather than telling other people what they should do. The Parliament is open to anyone, including members of new religious movements, who can afford to get there – and some financial help is available, especially for young people. The British-based World Congress of Faiths is presenting three programmes: A religious observance - ‘Respect for the Earth;’ A half day retreat – ‘The Inner Voice of Peace: Interfaith, A Life-Changing Experience;’ and a seminar on ‘Older People; Revered or Redundant.’

With over 8,000 participants, the Parliament’s programme will be very varied and reflect the different dimensions of interfaith activity today. Political leaders increasingly support interfaith because they hope that it can contribute to social cohesion and counteract extremists’ justification of violence by reference to religion. The importance of religion in shaping the community with which a person identifies and therefore in shaping a person’s sense of identity is easily underestimated especially by those who live in an increasingly secularised world. As a result, when conflict arises, although its causes are political or economic, because antagonists belong to different religions, that difference, and long remembered injustices, fuel the bitterness and are used to vilify the enemy. In the popular mind, therefore, and maybe the media, the conflict is then spoken of as a religious one or even a ‘holy war.’

In the long run education, at every level, is the key to improving interfaith relations. This still much often ignorance about other religions ensure that some study of world religions is included in the curriculum. People need also to learn about the artistic and musical heritage of other faiths.

The fruits of interfaith work, however, cannot be delivered without major theological rethinking in all religions. Over literal quotation of scriptures, which ignores centuries of scholarly interpretation needs to be challenged. The justification of violence made in the past by some religious traditions should be repudiated. People of faith need to affirm that there is One Divine Reality, even if understood differently in different traditions. For example, the words ‘Allah’ and ‘God’ both speak of the Almighty. More than three hundred years ago, the Sikh Guru Gobind Singh, insisted that ‘There is not One God for Hindus and another for Muslims.’ Increasingly, religious difference is valued and people of faith are glad to learn and share with each other. More often this results not from theological argument but by the friendships that grow from meetings such as the Parliament of Religions. New friendships can remove past misunderstandings.

Often it is more fruitful to concentrate on issues that are of common concern. Practical issues of poverty and climate change will claim the attention of others at the Parliament. People of faith are increasingly acting together to relieve human need and have been warning of the dangers of the moral vacuum at the heart of the New Economy. They are at the forefront of efforts to protect the environment. Religious NGOs have taken the lead in calling for a ban on cluster bombs. People of faith should speak for the poor, the marginalized and those who have no voice. The most difficult area is working together for peace. At the height of conflict, religious leaders can do little except call for restraint, but faiths can help to prevent hatred and have a major role in peace-building after violence by emphasizing the importance of reconciliation.

The inspiration for practical service for people of faith comes from their spiritual life. S, at the Parliament, each day will begin with religious observances, where participants can join with members of their own religion from around the world or experience another spiritual practice.

Only a few people can attend the Parliament but the event raises the profile of the wide range of interfaith activity across the world at local, national and international levels. UNESCO has taken important initiatives and are arranging a youth workshop at the Melbourne Parliament. The Second Forum of the Alliance of Civilizations, with UN backing, met in Turkey in April 2009. In 2008 the UN Population Fund arranged a Forum with Faith-Based Organizations for Population and Development. The possibility of a UN Decade for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue is under discussion.

Together all this activity is creating a global concern for peace, for the poor, for the environment. Only the future will judge whether all these meetings result in the urgent practical action, which is necessary. In Gandhi’s words, ‘Will it be of any use to the poorest and weakest’ members of our world community?

Revd Dr Marcus Braybrooke